MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hypoglycosylated Follistatin‐Like 1 Attenuates the Loss of Coronary and Cerebral Vascular Functional Capacity in Ossabaw Swine with Cardiometabolic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

2022· article· en· W4225400757 on OpenAlexaff
Darla L. Tharp, Shannon C. Kelly, Pamela K. Thorne, Amira Amin, Kleiton A. Silva, Christina M. Mueller, Jan Ivey, T. Dylan Olver, Pilar Ruiz‐Lozano, Craig A. Emter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionHeart failureMyocardial infarctionIschemic cardiomyopathyCoronary artery diseaseCardiac function curveArterioleVentricleCirculatory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of death, often resulting from heart failure caused by myocardial infarction. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is increasingly problematic clinically, with the combination of metabolic syndrome and chronic inflammation greatly increasing the risk for both coronary and cerebral vascular disease. Follistatin‐like 1 (FSTL1) is a protein that, when non‐glycosylated, displays regenerative properties including pro‐angiogenic effects and prevention of abnormal vascular remodeling. Thus, the objective of the current study was to assess the therapeutic benefit of human recombinant non‐glycosylated FSTL1 protein on both coronary and cerebral vascular function in a pre‐clinical Ossabaw swine model of myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesized FSTL1 would attenuate the development of coronary and cerebral vascular dysfunction in an experimental setting of cardiometabolic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Intact female Ossabaw swine (2 months old) were fed a Western Diet for 4 months to develop metabolic syndrome. At 6 months of age, animals were subjected to 90 minutes ischemia followed by reperfusion (I/R) to induce MI. One month post‐MI, ALZET osmotic pumps were implanted and either vehicle (MI group) or FSTL1 (MI+FSTL1 group) was delivered over two weeks, with terminal vascular experiments performed 2 months post‐MI. In vitro assessment of isolated coronary (n=5‐6 for infarct, border, and remote regions of the left ventricle; 139.5 ± 4.9 μm diameter) and cerebral (n=2‐6 for middle cerebral artery second order pial; 385.3 ± 18.7 μm diameter) arteriole function was examined using pressure myography. Dose response curves for: 1 ) U46619 (thromboxane A2 agonist); and 2 ) NS‐1619 (large‐conductance calcium‐activated potassium channel activator; BK Ca ) were conducted. A 2x2 ANOVA (Group X Dose) was used to determine significance at the p < 0.05 level. Cardiometabolic HFrEF was indicated by a combined ejection fraction of 38 ± 2% and a fasting HOMA‐IR of 3.8 ± 0.4 (vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 historical control). In coronary arterioles, the NS‐1619 induced vasodilatory capacity was increased ~18‐fold in MI+FSTL1 animals relative to MI (100 ± 13% vs. 1832 ± 3% in MI and MI+FSTL1, respectively) in the remote region of the heart (interaction effect), but not the infarct nor border regions. In cerebral arterioles, the vasoconstrictor capacity in response to U46619 was increased ~2‐fold in MI+FSTL1 relative to MI animals (100 ± 19% vs. 213 ± 25% in MI and MI+FSTL1, respectively; interaction effect). In conclusion, FSTL1 partially attenuates the loss of functional capacity in both coronary and cerebral arterioles, demonstrating its potential to improve vascular function in an experimental setting of cardiometabolic HFrEF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207