TRSA-Net: Task Relation Spatial Co-Attention for Joint Segmentation, Quantification and Uncertainty Estimation on Paired 2D Echocardiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical workflow of cardiac assessment on 2D echocardiography requires both accurate segmentation and quantification of the Left Ventricle (LV) from paired apical 4-chamber and 2-chamber. Moreover, uncertainty estimation is significant in clinically understanding the performance of a model. However, current research on 2D echocardiography ignores this vital task while joint segmentation with quantification, hence motivating the need for a unified optimization method. In this paper, we propose a multitask model with Task Relation Spatial co-Attention (referred as TRSA-Net) for joint segmentation, quantification, and uncertainty estimation on paired 2D echo. TRSA-Net achieves multitask joint learning by novelly exploring the spatial correlation between tasks. The task relation spatial co-attention learns the spatial mapping among task-specific features by non-local and co-excitation, which forcibly joints embedded spatial information in the segmentation and quantification. The Boundary-aware Structure Consistency (BSC) and Joint Indices Constraint (JIC) are integrated into the multitask learning optimization objective to guide the learning of segmentation and quantification paths. The BSC creatively promotes structural similarity of predictions, and JIC explores the internal relationship between three quantitative indices. We validate the efficacy of our TRSA-Net on the public CAMUS dataset. Extensive comparison and ablation experiments show that our approach can achieve competitive segmentation performance and highly accurate results on quantification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".