MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sympathetic transduction of blood pressure during graded lower body negative pressure

2022· article· en· W4225404441 on OpenAlexafffund
Massimo Nardone, Carlin Katerberg, André L. Teixeira, Philip J. Millar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransduction (biophysics)Blood pressureInternal medicineMedicineCardiologyBiologyBiophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Cross‐sectional work has demonstrated that participants with high resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) have lower resting sympathetic transduction of blood pressure (BP), and a larger proportion of sympathetic bursts firing above the BP set‐point (or mean BP). However, to date, most of these observations have been evaluated between participants with different levels of resting MSNA. The objective of the current study is to evaluate the influence of acute elevations in MSNA on sympathetic transduction of BP in young healthy adults using graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP). We hypothesize that sympathetic transduction will decrease during acute elevations in MSNA due to an increased proportion of MSNA bursts firing above the BP set‐point. Methods Ten (1 female) young healthy participants underwent 8 minutes of quiet rest, followed by a graded LBNP protocol consisting of 8‐minute stages at ‐10, ‐20, and ‐30mmHg. Beat‐to‐beat heart rate and BP were quantified using single‐lead electrocardiography and finger photoplethysmography, respectively, while MSNA was quantified using fibular nerve microneurography. Sympathetic transduction was quantified in the time (signal‐averaging) and frequency (MSNA‐diastolic BP low frequency [LF: 0.04‐0.15 Hz] transfer function magnitude) domains. Tertiles of diastolic BP were determined for each participant, and the proportion of MSNA bursts firings within each BP tertile were quantified. Results MSNA burst frequency increased progressively during graded LBNP (from 15±7 to 17±7, 22±7, and 27±9 bursts/min; P <0.01), while the proportion of MSNA bursts firing in the highest BP tertile remained stable (19±7, 18±9, 19±9, 19±7 %; P =0.72). Sympathetic transduction of BP was unchanged during LBNP (from 2.1±1.1 to 2.3±1.5, 2.1±1.2, and 2.0±1.1 mmHg; P =0.51), while the BP responses to non‐burst cardiac cycles decreased progressively (from ‐0.7±0.5 to ‐0.9±0.5, ‐1.0±0.4, and ‐1.4±0.7 mmHg; P <0.01). The difference between burst and non‐burst cardiac cycles (from 2.8±1.4 to 3.2±1.9, 3.1±1.5, and 3.4±1.3 mmHg; P =0.26) and the MSNA‐diastolic BP transfer function magnitude (from 0.14±0.09 to 0.14±0.06, 0.14±0.06, and 0.13±0.07 au/mmHg; P =0.40) were also unchanged during LBNP. Lastly, the change in the proportion of MSNA bursts firing in the largest BP tertile was associated with the change in signal‐averaged sympathetic transduction across each stage of LBNP (r= ‐0.79, ‐0.78, ‐0.81; P ≤0.01). Conclusion Sympathetic transduction of diastolic BP is unchanged during graded LBNP due to the heterogenous inter‐individual responses in the gating of bursts to diastolic BP. The proportion of bursts firing at high BPs are associated with changes in sympathetic transduction of BP. The determinants of gating MSNA burst occurrence by the arterial baroreflex and its capacity for modulation warrant further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207