MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Prenatal Hypoxia is Associated with Coronary Artery Endothelial Dysfunction in Male and Female Offspring

2022· article· en· W4225406387 on OpenAlexaff
Nataliia Hula, Mazhar Pasha, Anita Quon, Raven Kirschenman, Christy‐Lynn M. Cooke, Floor Spaans, Sandra T. Davidge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringVasodilationInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyEndothelial dysfunctionSodium nitroprussideHypoxia (environmental)EndotheliumNitric oxidePregnancyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Fetal hypoxia is a common consequence of complicated pregnancies and is linked to the development of cardiovascular (CV) dysfunction in the offspring. We showed an impaired cardiac function in adult prenatal hypoxia offspring, however, the mechanisms are not known. Coronary artery endothelial dysfunction has been shown to contribute to the development of cardiac dysfunction, however, whether endothelial function is impaired in coronary arteries of prenatal hypoxia offspring is unknown. We hypothesize that prenatal hypoxia leads to impaired coronary artery endothelial function in adult male and female offspring. Methods Pregnant Sprague‐Dawley rats were exposed to normoxia (21% O 2 ) or hypoxia (11% O 2 ; p‐Hyp) on gestational days 15‐21 (term=22 days). Male and female offspring were aged to 9‐9.5 months. Left anterior descending coronary arteries were isolated (n=5‐7/group), and endothelium‐dependent vasodilation to methylcholine (MCh) and endothelium‐independent vasodilation to the nitric oxide (NO) donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were assessed by wire myography. To assess the contribution of endothelial vasodilation pathways, MCh‐curves were performed in the presence/absence of inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (L‐NAME), prostaglandin H synthase ([PGHS]; meclofenamate), or small‐ and intermediate‐conductance Ca 2+ ‐activated potassium channels (apamin and TRAM‐34, respectively). Data were summarized as Emax (maximum vasodilation response), pEC 50 (concentration required to produce 50% of Emax) or Area Under the Curve (AUC). Data were compared by two‐way ANOVA (Sidak's post hoc test); p<0.05 was significant. Results Mch‐induced vasodilation (Emax) was decreased in p‐Hyp males (p=0.006) and females (p=0.032) compared to normoxia offspring. L‐NAME completely inhibited vasodilation (AUC) in normoxia and p‐Hyp males (p<0.0001). In the female offspring, incubation with L‐NAME completely inhibited vasodilation in the normoxia group (p<0.0001), but to a lesser extent (Emax ~15%) in the p‐Hyp offspring (p<0.0001). In contrast, meclofenamate did not alter MCh‐induced vasodilation (AUC) in males, while in females, meclofenamate increased vasodilation to MCh in the p‐Hyp group only (p=0.04). Apamin and TRAM‐34 did not alter responses to MCh in any of the groups. SNP sensitivity (pEC 50 ) was decreased in p‐Hyp females compared to normoxia controls (p=0.012), without changes in males. Conclusions Our data suggest that prenatal hypoxia leads to coronary artery endothelial dysfunction in male and female offspring. In prenatal hypoxia males, NO contribution to endothelium‐mediated vasodilation was reduced. In females, prenatal hypoxia increased PGHS‐dependent vasoconstriction and decreased smooth muscle sensitivity to NO. Understanding the mechanistic pathways involved in programming of CV disease may allow for the development of future prenatal and postnatal therapeutic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→