MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Visualizing the Gas Channel of a Monofunctional Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase

2022· article· en· W4225410145 on OpenAlexaff
Alison Biester, Sébastien Dementin, Catherine L. Drennan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsCarbon monoxide dehydrogenaseChemistryDesulfovibrio vulgarisCarbon monoxideBifunctionalBiochemistryBacteriaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH) plays an important role in the processing of one‐carbon gases carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. In CODH enzymes, these gases are channeled to and from the Ni‐Fe‐S active sites using hydrophobic cavities. In this work, we investigate these gas channels in a monofunctional CODH from Desulfovibrio vulgaris , which is unusual among CODHs for its oxygen‐tolerance. Based on computational predictions, we expect that monofunctional D. vulgaris CODH will have gas channels different from those of bifunctional Moorella thermoacetica carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl‐CoA synthase (CODH/ACS). By pressurizing D. vulgaris CODH protein crystals with xenon and solving the structure to 2.04 Å resolution, we identify 12 xenon sites per CODH monomer, thereby elucidating hydrophobic channels used for CO transport. We find that D. vulgaris CODH has one CO channel that has not been experimentally validated previously in a CODH, and a second channel that is shared with Moorella thermoacetica carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl‐CoA synthase (CODH/ACS). This experimental visualization of D. vulgaris CODH gas channels lays groundwork for further exploration of factors contributing to oxygen‐tolerance in this CODH, as well as study of channels in other CODHs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→