MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect of Prolonged High‐Altitude Exposure on Heart Rate Response to Central Sleep Apnea

2022· article· en· W4225420327 on OpenAlexafffund
Lindsey F. Berthelsen, Andrew R. Steele, Emily Vanden Berg, Jordan D. Bird, Scott F. Thrall, Richard J. A. Wilson, Nicholas Jendzjowsky, Trevor A. Day, Craig D. Steinback

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsMount Royal UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBradycardiaApneaMedicineHeart rateAnesthesiaSleep apneaEffects of high altitude on humansCentral sleep apneaHyperventilationCardiologyInternal medicinePolysomnographyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common at high‐altitude (>2500m) and is characterized by a cyclical pattern of hyperventilation and transient arterial hypocapnia, triggering apnea. We have demonstrated that voluntary wakeful apnea at altitude promotes a greater degree of bradycardia and cardiac arrhythmias than at sea level. However, whether bradyarrhythmias are observed during CSA at altitude has not been investigated. We investigated the duration dependent effect of altitude on heart rate changes during periods of apnea overnight. We hypothesized that overnight apnea would result in a greater magnitude of bradycardia with prolonged hypoxic exposure. Central sleep apnea (Apnea‐hypopnea index; AHI) was assessed overnight at low altitude (1045m), early (Night 2‐3) and late (Night 9‐10) at high altitude (N=14; 6 female). Heart rate (HR) and rhythm (electrocardiogram; ECG lead II) was collected alongside sleep data (RESMED Apnealink) to quantify sleep apnea events and desaturations. HR data were averaged over 10s prior to and 10s following apneas. Delta HR during apnea (BL HR – Nadir HR apnea) was determined to characterize bradycardia. Differences in heart rate prior to, during, and post apnea were compared using a repeated‐measures ANOVA design, with a Holm‐Sidak post‐hoc analysis where main effect of condition was significant. The magnitude of bradycardia during apneas between early and late time points were compared using a paired t‐test. Additional analyses of sex differences were performed using a two‐way mixed model ANOVA. AHI was augmented at high altitude (main effect p=0.012) but not different between early and late time points (p=0.193). The incidence of central apneic events was greater late at high‐altitude compared to low altitude (p=0.0045). Overnight oxygen saturation was decreased at high altitude (main effect of time, p<0.01) but was elevated late (84 ± 3%) compared to early (82 ± 4%) at altitude (p=0.038). Average HR overnight was similar between early (74 ± 11bpm) and late (69 ± 10bpm) time points (p=0.134). HR dropped during apneas at early (‐6.2±4.6 bpm; p=0.018) and late (‐6.4±2.8 bpm; p<0.001) timepoints. Female participants had a lower AHI at high altitude (p=0.006) but tended to have a greater bradycardia (‐7.7± 5.6bpm early, ‐7.6±2.9bpm late) compared to men (‐3.9±0.68bpm early; ‐4.5±1.4bpm late; main effect of sex, p=0.052). We demonstrate that CSA at altitude is associated with bradycardia that does not appear to become greater with prolonged exposure. It appears females may be less susceptible to CSA but have a greater bradycardic response during apneas compared to males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia→French-language works237,207→