An Interleaved Bridgeless Single-Stage AC/DC Converter With Stacked Switches Configurations and Soft-Switching Operation for High-Voltage EV Battery Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel single-stage ac/dc isolated onboard charger with modular stacked switches structure utilizing interleaved control is proposed in this article for high-voltage (HV) battery systems in electric vehicles (EVs). In the proposed converter, modular interleaved bridgeless ac/dc boost converters are integrated with modular <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CLL</i> resonant circuits through sharing the two legs of stacked switches. With this configuration, the voltage stress across each switch is reduced to half of the dc-link voltage, which makes the circuit applicable for HV battery system (such as 800 V) in EVs. In the proposed design, the integrated interleaved boost circuit modules allow low input current ripple to be achieved. Two step-up resonant circuit modules are then connected to the two interleaved legs with their outputs connected in series at the input of a current-fed high-frequency rectifier. Soft-switching commutation is achieved for all switches and diodes in the proposed converter. The descriptions of the proposed converter and its operating principles will be discussed in this article. A silicon-carbide-based hardware prototype with a rated power of 2.4 kW, 90–135 Vac/800 Vdc system has been tested in the laboratory. Results confirmed that a power factor of 0.97 and a peak efficiency of 97.9% were achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it