MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225499803 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c04033

Exploring Structural Nuances in Germanium Halide Perovskites Using Solid-State <sup>73</sup> Ge and <sup>133</sup> Cs NMR Spectroscopy

2022· article· en· W4225499803 on OpenAlexafffund
Riley W. Hooper, Chuyi Ni, Dylan G. Tkachuk, Yingjie He, Victor V. Terskikh, Jonathan G. C. Veinot, Vladimir K. Michaelis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Alberta
KeywordsGermaniumHalideDensity functional theoryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceChemistrySpectroscopyCrystallographyMaterials scienceComputational chemistryNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsSiliconInorganic chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal halide perovskites remain top candidates for higher-performance photovoltaic devices, but concerns about leading lead-based materials remain. Ge perovskites remain understudied for use in solar cells compared to their Sn-based counterparts. In this work, we undertake a combined 73 Ge and 133 Cs solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) study of the bulk CsGeX 3 (X = Cl, Br, or I) series. We show how seemingly small structural variations within germanium halide perovskites have major effects on their 73 Ge and 133 Cs NMR signatures and reveal a near-cubic phase at room temperature for CsGeCl 3 with severe local Ge polyhedral distortion. Quantum chemical computations are effective at predicting the structural impact on NMR parameters for 73 Ge and 133 Cs. This study demonstrates the value of a combined solid-state NMR and DFT approach for investigating promising materials for energy applications, providing information that is out of reach with conventional characterization methods, and adds the challenging 73 Ge nucleus to the NMR toolkit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207