Toward Adaptive Joint Node and Link Mapping Algorithms for Embedding Virtual Networks: A Conciliation Strategy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network virtualization (NV) has emerged as a momentous facilitator for a notable triumph of future networks by allowing a flexibility, cost-efficiency and on-demand services through the deployment of heterogeneous network service requests on a shared physical infrastructure. The most major challenge of NV is to efficiently and effectively map diversified virtual network requests (VNRs), comprising a set of virtual nodes connected by virtual links, onto a shared substrate network meeting various stringent resource constraints. Most of the research papers in this field have merely focused on separate virtual node mapping (VNoM) or virtual link mapping (VLiM) with scalable heuristic algorithms for simple implementations. Unfortunately, the lack of a coordination between node and link mapping stages might cause low embedding results. In this paper, we present a new approach relied upon Genetic Algorithm (GA), that jointly coordinates virtual node and link mappings where the link mapping is based on three different path searching methods. Moreover, a novel heuristic conciliation mechanism is proposed to deal with a set of possibly infeasible link mappings while exploring embedding solutions within the operations of GA algorithm. Extensive performance results indicate that our proposed GA-based algorithms outperform state-of-the-art virtual mapping algorithms in all evaluation metrics we adopt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".