Time series analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes and correlations among highly prevalent mutations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The efforts of the scientific community to tame the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic seems to have been diluted by the emergence of new viral strains. Therefore, it becomes imperative to study and understand the effect of mutations on viral evolution, fitness and pathogenesis. In this regard, we performed a time-series analysis on 59541 SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences from around the world. These 59541 genomes were grouped according to the months (January 2020-March 2021) based on the collection date. Meta-analysis of this data led us to identify highly significant mutations in viral genomes. Correlation and Hierarchical Clustering of the highly significant mutations led us to the identification of sixteen mutation pairs that were correlated with each other and were present in >30% of the genomes under study. Among these mutation pairs, some of the mutations have been shown to contribute towards the viral replication and fitness suggesting the possible role of other unexplored mutations in viral evolution and pathogenesis. Additionally, we employed various computational tools to investigate the effects of T85I, P323L, and Q57H mutations in Non-structural protein 2 (Nsp2), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and Open reading frame 3a (ORF3a) respectively. Results show that T85I in Nsp2 and Q57H in ORF3a mutations are deleterious and destabilize the parent protein whereas P323L in RdRp is neutral and has a stabilizing effect. The normalized linear mutual information (nLMI) calculations revealed the significant residue correlation in Nsp2 and ORF3a in contrast to reduce correlation in RdRp protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".