MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225518108 · doi:10.1186/s13148-022-01268-w

Epigenome-wide contributions to individual differences in childhood phenotypes: a GREML approach

2022· article· en· W4225518108 on OpenAlex
Alexander Neumann, Jean‐Baptiste Pingault, Janine F. Felix, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Henning Tiemeier, Charlotte A. M. Cecil, Esther Walton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Epigenetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsEconomic and Social Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilHorizon 2020Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchZonMwWellcome TrustNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilErasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
KeywordsEpigenomeHuman geneticsPhenotypeComputational biologyBiologyBioinformaticsGeneticsMedicineDNA methylationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism involved in human development. Numerous epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have investigated the associations of DNA methylation at single CpG sites with childhood outcomes. However, the overall contribution of DNA methylation across the genome ( R 2 Methylation ) towards childhood phenotypes is unknown. An estimate of R 2 Methylation would provide context regarding the importance of DNA methylation explaining variance in health outcomes. We therefore estimated the variance explained by epigenome-wide cord blood methylation ( R 2 Methylation ) for five childhood phenotypes: gestational age, birth weight, and body mass index (BMI), IQ and ADHD symptoms at school age. We adapted a genome-based restricted maximum likelihood (GREML) approach with cross-validation (CV) to DNA methylation data and applied it in two population-based birth cohorts: ALSPAC ( n = 775) and Generation R ( n = 1382). Results Using information from > 470,000 autosomal probes we estimated that DNA methylation at birth explains 32% (SD CV = 0.06) of gestational age variance and 5% (SD CV = 0.02) of birth weight variance. The R 2 Methylation estimates for BMI, IQ and ADHD symptoms at school age estimates were near 0% across almost all cross-validation iterations. Conclusions The results suggest that cord blood methylation explains a moderate degree of variance in gestational age and birth weight, in line with the success of previous EWAS in identifying numerous CpG sites associated with these phenotypes. In contrast, we could not obtain a reliable estimate for school-age BMI, IQ and ADHD symptoms. This may reflect a null bias due to insufficient sample size to detect variance explained in more weakly associated phenotypes, although the true R 2 Methylation for these phenotypes is likely below that of gestational age and birth weight when using DNA methylation at birth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it