Development of an Adaptive and Weighted Model Predictive Control Algorithm for Autonomous Driving With Disturbance Estimation and Grey Prediction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an adaptive and weighted model predictive control (MPC) algorithm for autonomous driving with disturbance estimation and prediction. Unexpected and unpredictable disturbances in the real world limit the performance of MPC. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes adaptive and weighted prediction methods with a sliding mode observer and a weighting function with the grey prediction model. The sliding mode observer is designed for disturbance estimation with finite stability conditions, and the estimated disturbance is predicted using the grey prediction model. Based on the adaptive and weighted prediction method, the length of prediction horizon and cost value of each predicted state are adjusted in real time to eliminate any negative impact on future predicted states. Meanwhile, a variation in the cost value, which is caused by prediction horizon adaptation and weighted prediction, may harm the control performance as it can excessively increase or decrease the model uncertainty. Therefore, an input weighting factor is adapted in the MPC cost function based on an exponential weighting function. The performance of the proposed adaptive control algorithm is evaluated using CarMaker software under longitudinal and lateral autonomous driving scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it