A hybrid analog-ensemble, convolutional-neural-network method for post-processing precipitation forecasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An ensemble precipitation forecast post-processing method is proposed by hybridizing the Analog Ensemble (AnEn), Minimum Divergence Schaake Shuffle (MDSS), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) methods. This AnEn-CNN hybrid takes the ensemble mean of Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) 3-hourly precipitation forecasts as input and produces bias-corrected, probabilistically calibrated, and physically realistic gridded precipitation forecast sequences out to 7-days. The AnEn-CNN hybrid post-processing is trained on the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5), and verified against station observations across British Columbia (BC), Canada, from 2017 to 2019. The AnEn-CNN hybrid produces more skillful forecasts than a quantile-mapped GEFS baseline and other conventional AnEn methods, with a roughly 10% increase in Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score. Further, it outperforms other AnEn methods by 0-60% in terms of Brier Skill Score (BSS) for heavy precipitation periods across disparate hydrological regions. Longer forecast lead times exhibit larger performance gains. Verification against 7-day accumulated precipitation totals for heavy precipitation periods also demonstrates that precipitation sequences are realistically reconstructed. Case studies further show that the AnEn-CNN hybrid scheme produces more realistic spatial precipitation patterns and precipitation intensity spectra. This work pioneers the combination of conventional statistical post-processing and neural networks, and is one of only a few studies pertaining to precipitation ensemble post-processing in BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".