Analysis and Design of Efficient Interleaved Bidirectional Converter With Winding Cross Coupled Inductors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a nonisolated bidirectional converter (BDC) with high voltage conversion ratio. The structure of winding-cross-coupled-inductors (WCCIs) is developed in the two-phase interleaved BDC to achieve the excellent features of current-ripple-cancellation, current sharing, and high voltage-gain. Furthermore, the proposed topology uses two active and passive clamp circuits to recover the coupled inductors’ leakage energy and to maintain the overall efficiency at a high level providing zero voltage switching (ZVS) in boost mode. A rearrangement is applied to high-voltage-side switches to avoid the interference of clamp circuits operation in boost and buck modes. Detailed analysis and design methodology of the proposed converter are provided and a high gain 500 W, 48 V/380 V prototype is implemented to verify the performance of the proposed converter. Peak efficiencies of 96% and 94.3% are measured for boost and buck modes, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".