Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8. Infrastructuring DNA Commercial genetic testing 1 www.23andme.com(last accessed May 28, 2020). 2 In my analysis, I concentrate on companies that offer autosomal (pertaining to chromosomes that are not sex chromosomes) DNA testing for genetic genealogy and have a matching database.Such tests are currently offered by Ancestry, FTDNA, 23andMe and MyHeritage.Besides, Living DNA offers ancestry analysis consisting of Y-DNA and mtDNA haplogroup reports, but does not currently have its own database for matching (www.livingdna.com,last accessed May 28, 2020).However, test results can be uploaded to GEDmatch if users want to search for genetic matches.A plethora of other tests are available as well.For example, Christofides and O'Doherty found 86 companies that offered direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Canada, with 29 of them offering health tests (2016: 108).'Working out relationships' required putting in effort and having matches that were 'close enough'.However, Elizabeth knew of donor-conceived people for whom finding more distant cousins had worked:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it