MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225636426 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2022.3224926

Energy-Efficient Design for a NOMA Assisted STAR-RIS Network With Deep Reinforcement Learning

2022· preprint· en· W4225636426 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Fang, Donghong Cai, Zhiguo Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsReinforcement learningTelecommunications linkComputer scienceMaximizationBase stationBeamformingStar (game theory)Mathematical optimizationTransmission (telecommunications)Efficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)WirelessWireless networkNomaAlgorithmComputer networkEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simultaneous transmitting and reflecting reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (STAR-RISs) have been considered promising auxiliary devices to enhance the performance of the wireless network, where users located at different sides of the surfaces can be simultaneously served by the transmitting or reflecting signals. In this article, an energy efficiency (EE) optimization problem for non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) assisted STAR-RIS downlink network is investigated. Due to the fractional form of the objective function, it is challenging to solve the EE optimization problem using traditional convex optimization solutions. This article proposes a deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG)-based algorithm to maximize the EE by jointly optimizing the transmission beamforming vectors at the base station and the coefficients matrices at the STAR-RIS. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can effectively maximize the system EE considering the time-varying channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207