MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225660666 · doi:10.1111/cod.14035

Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema

2021· article· en· W4225660666 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob P. Thyssen, Marie L. A. Schuttelaar, José Hernán Alfonso, Klaus E. Andersen, Irena Angelova‐Fischer, B.W.M. Arents, Andrea Bauer, Richard Brans, Alicia Cannavó, Wianda A. Christoffers, M.N. Crépy, Peter Elsner, Francesca Larese Filon, Ana M. Giménez‐Arnau, Margarida Gonçalo, Maria G. Guzmán‐Perera, Carsten R. Hamann, Wolfram Hoetzenecker, Jeanne Duus Johansen, Swen Malte John, A.C.M. Kunkeler, Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić, Sonja Molin, Rosemary Nixon, Jart A. F. Oosterhaven, Thomas Rustemeyer, E. Serra‐Baldrich, Mili Shah, Dagmar Simon, Christoph Skudlik, Radosław Śpiewak, Skaidra Valiukevičienė, Angelique N. Voorberg, Elke Weißhaar, Tove Agner

Bibliographic record

VenueContact Dermatitis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersLundbeckfonden
KeywordsHand eczemaMedicineDermatologyAllergyContact dermatitisImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common inflammatory skin disorder. Health care providers need continuously updated information about the management of hand eczema to ensure best treatment for their patients. OBJECTIVES: To update the European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment on of hand eczema. METHOD: The Guideline Development Group (GDG) was established on behalf of the ESCD. A call for interest was launched via the ESCD website and via the ESCD members' mailing list. Appraisal of the evidence for therapeutic and preventive interventions was applied and a structured method of developing consensus was used and moderated by an external methodologist. The final guideline was approved by the ESCD executive committee and was in external review on the ESCD webpage for 1 month. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for several statements and management strategies. CONCLUSION: The updated guideline should improve management of hand eczema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations264
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContact DermatitisSame topicContact Dermatitis and AllergiesFrench-language works237,207