Carrier Transition Techniques for Parallel Connected VSCs Using Cross-Coupled Inductors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parallel inverters can be connected using cross-coupled inductors (CIs) to produce high-quality line voltages in three-phase ac systems. Since no fundamental flux is present in the inductor cores, their size can be made considerably smaller than alternative inductor configurations. Interleaved switching and phase-shifted carriers (PS-PWM) can be used to produce multilevel three-phase line voltages. A modified approach (MPS-PWM) improves the quality of the line voltages by changing the phase of the carriers, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">carrier swapping</i> , based upon the magnitude of the modulating signals. Since carrier swapping in MPS-PWM can cause the inductor circulating currents and flux patterns to jump and have dc offsets, two carrier transition techniques are presented to eliminate these jumps: <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">carrier manipulation</i> and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">pulse injection</i> . These techniques represent open-loop PWM control, dependent only on the carrier phase change being used, and can easily be applied to an arbitrary number of parallel-connected inverters. The circulating currents and inductor flux patterns follow predictable patterns, allowing the CIs to be designed more precisely. The relative merits of using MPS-PWM over PS-PWM are assessed using measurements of the load current total harmonic distortion and the line voltage harmonic volt–seconds. The feasibility of the parallel inverter system described is verified using simulations and results from an experimental laboratory prototype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".