MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225694316 · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxac040

CWSOGG: Catching Web Shell Obfuscation Based on Genetic Algorithm and Generative Adversarial Network

2022· article· en· W4225694316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Computer Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsObfuscationComputer scienceDiscriminatorGenerator (circuit theory)Artificial intelligenceWeb pageShell (structure)Web applicationMachine learningData miningSet (abstract data type)Computer securityWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A web shell is a backdoor used by hackers to control Web servers and perform privilege escalation, and thus it is crucial to detect web shells effectively. However, the detection of obfuscated web shells has always been a challenge. Inspired by adversarial training methods in the field of computer vision, this paper proposes a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based web shell detection model training framework. Since there has been no method that can generate obfuscated web shells effectively, a generator based on the genetic algorithm, which combines and optimizes the pre-set obfuscation methods, is used to obtain new obfuscation combinations and generate obfuscated samples. The whole proposed framework is named the CWSOGG. When training the detection model, the generator generates web shells that can bypass the discriminator, and the discriminator catches the features of obfuscated samples. Through the adversarial training of the discriminator and generator, the detection model improves its ability to detect obfuscated web shells. To verify the proposed framework is flexible to different models, the discriminator based on four main neural networks has been implemented. Meanwhile, to build complete feature extraction models, both statistical and semantic features are extracted. Due to the lack of web shell data, a clean dataset containing 4,375 web shells is constructed and used to evaluate the CWSOGG. The results have shown that the detection accuracy of each model increases by 86.71% on the generated obfuscated web shells on average and by 7.50% on the simulated real-world obfuscated web shells on average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it