MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225712217 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202226201008

Summary of the<i>K</i><sup>−</sup><i>pp</i>bound-state observation in E15 and future prospects

2022· article· en· W4225712217 on OpenAlexaff
F. Sakuma, Shuhei Ajimura, T. Akaishi, H. Asano, M. Bazzi, George Beer, H. Bhang, Mario Bragadireanu, P. Buehler, Luigi Busso, M. Cargnelli, Seonho Choi, A. Clozza, C. Curceanu, S. Enomoto, Hiroyuki Fujioka, Yuya Fujiwara, Tomokazu Fukuda, C. Guaraldo, T. Hashimoto, R. Hayano, Toshihiko Hiraiwa, Iio M, Kentaro Inoue, Y. Ishiguro, Takashi Ishikawa, S. Ishimoto, K. Itahashi, M. Iwasaki, Masaaki Iwai, Koki Kanno, K. Kato, Yuko Kato, Shingo Kawasaki, Paul Kienle, Hiroshi Kou, Yue Ma, J. Márton, Y. Matsuda, Marco Miliucci, Y. Mizoi, Ombretta Morra, R. Murayama, T. Nagae, H. Noumi, H. Ohnìshì, S. Okada, H. Outa, K. Ozawa, Kristian Piscicchia, Y. Sada, A. Sakaguchi, Masaharu Sato, A. Scordo, M. Sekimoto, H. Shi, K. Shirotori, Diana Laura Sirghi, F. Sirghi, S. Suzuki, Takatoshi Suzuki, K. Tanida, H. Tatsuno, Makoto Tokuda, Dai Tomono, A. Toyoda, Kyo Tsukada, O. Vázquez Doce, E. Widmann, T. Yamaga, Toshimitsu Yamazaki, Chihiro Yoshida, Qi Zhang, J. Zmeskal

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleFP7 International CooperationJapan Atomic Energy AgencyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsBar (unit)PhysicsBound stateState (computer science)Nuclear physicsEnergy (signal processing)Binding energyAtomic physicsParticle physicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The possible existence of deeply-bound $\bar K$-nuclear bound states, kaonic nuclei, has been widely discussed as products of the strongly attractive $\bar K$ N interaction in I = 0 channels. Investigations of those exotic states will provide us unique information of the $\bar K$ N interaction below the threshold, which is still not fully understood so far. Recently, we observed the simplest kaonic nuclei, $\bar K$ NN , having a much deeper binding energy than normal nuclei via inflight ( K − , N ) reactions at the J-PARC E15 experiment. For further studies, we have proposed a series of experimental programs for the systematic investigation of light kaonic nuclei, from $\bar K$ N (Λ(1405)) to $\bar K$ NNNN . We will measure the $\bar K$ NNN ( A = 3) system at the new experiment approved as J-PARC E80, as a first step toward a comprehensive study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207