MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225755258 · doi:10.5376/rgg.2022.13.0004

Analysis of Microarray Data of Rice EPAGRI 108 under Excess Fe Stress

2022· article· en· W4225755258 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Weihua Liu, Shuyan Kou, Zhigang Wu, Zhenhua Zhu, Yuan PingRong

Bibliographic record

VenueRice Genomics and Genetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneBiologyMicroarray analysis techniquesGene expressionGermplasmMicroarrayGene ontologyFold changeGene expression profilingGeneticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron is one of the essential micronutrients to rice, but the accumulation of excessive ferrous salt in soil can cause toxicity. In this study, bioinformatics method was used to mine the data of Affymetrix rice gene expression microarray to study the differentially expressed genes of rice germplasm EPAGRI 108 under control and excess Fe conditions. The results revealed that 407 genes with more than two fold difference were identified. Compared to the control group, 330 genes were up regulated and 77 genes were down regulated under excess Fe stress. Gene Ontology and pathway analysis revealed that these differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in the biological processes such as oxidoreductase activity, glucose metabolism, amino acid metabolism, etc. Through these data analysis, we preliminarily explored the gene expression patterns of rice under excess Fe conditions, and provided a theoretical basis for further investgating the molecular mechanism tolerating for rice tolerance to Fe toxicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRice Genomics and GeneticsSame topicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsFrench-language works237,207