MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225777979 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggac104

Electric field calculations for real-time space weather alerting systems

2022· article· en· W4225777979 on OpenAlexafffund
D. H. Boteler, Risto Pirjola

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsTransfer functionGibbs phenomenonFourier transformMathematical analysisEarth's magnetic fieldImpulse responseInverseFilter (signal processing)Electric fieldPhysicsMathematicsMagnetic fieldComputer scienceGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Space weather alerting systems for power systems require real-time calculations of the electric fields that drive geomagnetically induced currents. In this paper, we present a new method for calculating the Earth impulse response that can be convolved with real-time magnetic field data to give the required electric fields. We start with the Earth transfer function which can be expressed in two ways: as a relationship between the electric field, E, and the geomagnetic field, B, which has characteristics equivalent to that of a high-pass filter, and between E and the time derivative of the magnetic field, dB/dt, which has characteristics of a low-pass filter. An inverse Fourier transform of these transfer functions should then give the corresponding Earth impulse responses in the time domain. This works well for a uniform conductivity model for which the inverse Fourier transform of the transfer function has an analytic solution. However, the inverse Fourier transform of the transfer function for a non-uniform conductivity model requires numerical calculations and produces an acausal impulse response with oscillations because of the Gibbs phenomenon. To investigate the origin of the Gibbs oscillations, the real and imaginary parts of the transfer functions are transformed separately. This shows that the Gibbs oscillations arise from the inverse transform of the real and imaginary parts of the high-pass transfer function and the imaginary part of the low-pass transfer function. A new method is introduced that just transforms the real part of the low-pass transfer function and uses the requirement of causality to construct the full low-pass impulse response. From this, the derivative theorem of convolution is used to obtain the high-pass impulse response. Electric fields can then be calculated by convolution of the low-pass impulse response with the rate of change of the magnetic field, dB/dt, or by convolution of the high-pass impulse response with the magnetic field, B. Tests of the new method by comparison with analytic solutions for specified earth models and synthetic magnetic field data gave very high correlation coefficients, slopes near 1.0 and intercepts near zero, showing the accuracy of the new method. The method can be used with any Earth transfer function whether obtained from magnetotelluric measurements or from 1-D, 2-D or 3-D conductivity models. Thus, it provides a versatile technique that avoids the Gibbs phenomenon and produces a causal impulse response suitable for time domain calculations of electric fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207