MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225807748 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.07244

A Simple Approximation Algorithm for Vector Scheduling and Applications to Stochastic Min-Norm Load Balancing

2021· preprint· en· W4225807748 on OpenAlex
Sharat Ibrahimpur, Chaitanya Swamy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJob shop schedulingCombinatoricsApproximation algorithmMathematicsBinary logarithmScheduling (production processes)Norm (philosophy)Upper and lower boundsMonotone polygonSigmaRandom variableDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationComputer scienceStatisticsPhysicsScheduleMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the Vector Scheduling problem on identical machines: we have m machines, and a set J of n jobs, where each job j has a processing-time vector $p_j\in \mathbb{R}^d_{\geq 0}$. The goal is to find an assignment $σ:J\to [m]$ of jobs to machines so as to minimize the makespan $\max_{i\in [m]}\max_{r\in [d]}( \sum_{j:σ(j)=i}p_{j,r})$. A natural lower bound on the optimal makespan is lb $:=\max\{\max_{j\in J,r\in [d]}p_{j,r},\max_{r\in [d]}(\sum_{j\in J}p_{j,r}/m)\}$. Our main result is a very simple O(log d)-approximation algorithm for vector scheduling with respect to the lower bound lb: we devise an algorithm that returns an assignment whose makespan is at most O(log d)*lb. As an application, we show that the above guarantee leads to an O(log log m)-approximation for Stochastic Minimum-Norm Load Balancing (StochNormLB). In StochNormLB, we have m identical machines, a set J of n independent stochastic jobs whose processing times are nonnegative random variables, and a monotone, symmetric norm $f:\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$. The goal is to find an assignment $σ:J\to [m]$ that minimizes the expected $f$-norm of the induced machine-load vector, where the load on machine i is the (random) total processing time assigned to it. Our O(log log m)-approximation guarantee is in fact much stronger: we obtain an assignment that is simultaneously an O(log log m)-approximation for StochNormLB with all monotone, symmetric norms. Next, this approximation factor significantly improves upon the O(log m/log log m)-approximation in (Ibrahimpur and Swamy, FOCS 2020) for StochNormLB, and is a consequence of a more-general black-box reduction that we present, showing that a $γ(d)$-approximation for d-dimensional vector scheduling with respect to the lower bound lb yields a simultaneous $γ(\log m)$-approximation for StochNormLB with all monotone, symmetric norms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it