MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225851441 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egac031

Reconciling Garnet Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd and Monazite U–Pb Ages for a Prolonged Metamorphic Event, Northern New Mexico

2022· article· en· W4225851441 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth M. Bollen, Harold H. Stowell, Ruth F. Aronoff, Sara Stotter, Christopher G. Daniel, Christopher R.M. McFarlane, Jeffrey D. Vervoort

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonaziteGeologyMetamorphic rockGeochemistryClosure temperatureZirconMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Garnet Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf isotopic data are increasingly used in tandem to characterize tectono-metamorphic events and their duration because the two chronometers may yield a progression from older Lu–Hf to younger Sm–Nd ages. In this contribution, we utilize garnet compositional zoning and monazite U–Pb ages to evaluate explanations for differences in garnet Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf ages for low- to mid-amphibolite facies rocks from the Picuris and Tusas Mountains, New Mexico. Ten Sm–Nd ages, eight Lu–Hf garnet ages (6 previously published), and four matrix monazite U–Pb dates span 1422–1370 Ma, 1456–1399 Ma, and 1377–1356 Ma, respectively. The weighted means of garnet ages are 1398 ± 11 Ma for Sm–Nd (N = 10/10) and 1402 ± 4 Ma for Lu–Hf (N = 6/8); however, Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf ages from three samples differ by 29, 34, and 55 my with differences between 2σ age envelopes of 12, 9, and 38 my., respectively. In these samples, primary Lu and Sm zoning in garnet, diffusion modification of zoning, or disequilibrium is sufficient to cause older Lu–Hf ages and younger Sm–Nd ages. Alternatively, two of the three Lu–Hf ages, c. 1450 Ma, may reflect the onset of a prolonged regional event or an earlier thermal event, and the three c. 1370 Ma garnet Sm–Nd ages may reflect diffusional re-equilibration. These three c. 1370 Ma ages are indistinguishable from the monazite ages, and garnet have trace element zoning consistent with diffusional alteration of growth zoning in Sm and Nd but not Lu and Hf. Garnet from the other seven samples have prograde zoning with little to no evidence for diffusional relaxation of zoning in these elements. We conclude that the majority of garnet preserve primary compositions and indistinguishable garnet ages of c. 1400 Ma, indicating a c. 22 my garnet growth history based on weighted mean. The two oldest c. 1450 Lu–Hf and three youngest c. 1370 Sm–Nd garnet ages require an earlier thermal history and modification of garnet composition, respectively. Results of this study redefine the youngest extent of amphibolite facies metamorphism during the Picuris orogeny to at least c. 1370 Ma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207