DP-VAE: Human-Readable Text Anonymization for Online Reviews with Differentially Private Variational Autoencoders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While vast amounts of personal data are shared daily on public online platforms and used by companies and analysts to gain valuable insights, privacy concerns are also on the rise: Modern authorship attribution techniques have proven effective at identifying individuals from their data, such as their writing style or behavior of picking and judging movies. It is hence crucial to develop data sanitization methods that allow sharing of users' data while protecting their privacy and preserving quality and content of the original data. In this paper, we tackle anonymization of textual data and propose an end-to-end differentially private variational autoencoder architecture. Unlike previous approaches that achieve differential privacy on a per-word level through individual perturbations, our solution works at an abstract level by perturbing the latent vectors that provide a global summary of the input texts. Decoding an obfuscated latent vector thus not only allows our model to produce coherent, high-quality output text that is human-readable, but also results in strong anonymization due to the diversity of the produced data. We evaluate our approach on IMDb movie and Yelp business reviews, confirming its anonymization capabilities and preservation of the semantics and utility of the original sentences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".