Human–Robot Collaboration in 3D via Force Myography Based Interactive Force Estimations Using Cross-Domain Generalization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, human robot collaboration (HRC) via force myography (FMG) bio-signal was investigated. Interactive hand force was estimated during moving a wooden rod in 3D with a Kuka robot. A baseline FMG-based deep convolutional neural network (FMG-DCNN) model could moderately estimate applied forces during the HRC task. Model performance can be improved with additional training data; however, collection of it was impractical and time-consuming. Available long-term multiple source data (32 feature spaces) during human robot interaction (HRI) with a linear robot collected over a long time period might be useful. Therefore, we explored a cross-domain generalization (CDG) technique that allowed pretraining a model to transfer knowledge between two unrelated source (2D-HRI) and target data (3D-HRC) for the first time. An FMG-based transfer learning with CDG (TL-CDG) model trained with these multiple source domains was examined in estimating applied forces from 16-channel FMG data during interactions with the Kuka robot. Two target scenarios were evaluated:case$i$) collaborative task of moving the wooden rod in 3D, andcase ii)grasping interactions in 1D. In both cases, few calibration data finetuned the TL-CDG model and improved recognizing out-of-domain target data (case i:$\text{R}^{2}\approx 60$-63%, and case ii:$\text{R}^{2}\approx 79$-87%) compared to the baseline FMG-DCNN model. Hence, cross-domain generalization could be useful in platform-independent FMG-based HRI applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".