MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TLS Performance Evaluation in the Control Plane of a 5G Core Network Slice

2021· article· en· W4225874672 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Hosseini Vasoukolaei, Danish Sattar, Ashraf Matrawy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceCipherNetwork packetCore networkRouterKey exchangeOverhead (engineering)Transport Layer SecurityOperating systemPublic-key cryptographyEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3GPP has recommended 5G service providers adopt Transport Layer Security (TLS) to secure communications among different Network Functions (NFs) in 5G core network slice. It is imperative to study the impact of TLS on 5G control plane traffic. Previous research has shown that TLS adds costs to protocols, like Session Independent Protocol (SIP) and The Onion Router (ToR). This study aims to study different TLS cipher suites impact on network performance parameters such as packet size, time, and the number of messages sent in distinct 5G control flows. We emulated a 5G core network slice using an open-source project and measured the overhead on the network parameters while 5G slice components transmit control plane traffic in both cases of TLS and no TLS. We examined the impact of three cipher suites of TLS with key exchange algorithm of Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA) on the NF registration with Network Repository Function (NRF).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207