MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225875154 · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3162927

Fast-Locking Burst-Mode Clock and Data Recovery for Parallel VCSEL-Based Optical Link Receivers

2022· article· en· W4225875154 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdullah Ibn Abbas, Glenn Cowan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia UniversityCMC Microsystems
KeywordsJitterComputer scienceBurst mode (computing)Clock recoveryChannel (broadcasting)Data recoveryIdleOffset (computer science)Real-time computingVertical-cavity surface-emitting laserElectronic engineeringComputer hardwarePhysicsLaserClock signalOpticsComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A burst-mode clock-and-data-recovery (CDR) system for a multi-channel vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL)-based non-return-to-zero (NRZ) optical link’s quarter-rate receivers is presented, that utilizes proxy timing recovery for fast turn-on time. The proxy timing recovery scheme takes advantage of correlated data jitter over parallel optical lanes typically deployed in a data center. Rapid timing recovery of the burst-mode channel is enabled by incrementing/decrementing its phase rotator (PR) control code during idle periods using phase updates from an always-active channel in the link. This work also presents circuit-design techniques to reduce power dissipation during idle times while still enabling fast turn-on time. Simulated in 65 nm CMOS technology, the proposed CDR consumes only 19.5 mW per channel while operating at 10 Gbps/ch and 0.58 mW during its idle-state. Simulation results are presented for the turn-on time with the proposed technique and compared against the turn-on time of a conventional receiver. The proposed technique allows the CDR to lock within 26 unit intervals (UIs) from when it is powered on irrespective of a 1000 ppm frequency offset between the incoming data and the CDR’s reference clock. The complete CDR of each channel occupies an area of 0.045 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> . The proposed scheme introduces only 1.3 % of area and 2.6 % of on-state power overhead while reducing idle-time power dissipation by 97 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207