Dynamical processing of orientation precision in the primary visual cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In our daily visual environment, the primary visual cortex (V1) processes distributions of oriented features as the basis of our visual computations. Changes of the global, median orientation of such inputs form the basis of our canonical knowledge about V1. However, another overlooked but defining characteristic of these sensory variables is their precision, which characterizes the level of variance in the input to V1. Such variability is an intrinsic part of natural images, yet it remains unclear if and how V1 accounts for the changes in orientation precision to achieve its robust orientation recognition performances. Here, we used naturalistic stimuli to characterize the response of V1 neurons to quantified variations of orientation precision. We found that about thirty percent of the recorded neurons showed a form of invariant responses to input precision. While feedforward mechanisms failed to account for the existence of these resilient neurons, neuronal competition within V1 explained the extent to which a neuron is invariant to precision. Using a decoding algorithm, we showed that the existence of such neurons in the population response of V1 can serve to encode both the orientation and its precision in the V1 population activity, which improves the robustness of the overall neural code. These precision-specific neurons operate with slow recurrent cortical dynamics, which supports the notion of predictive precisionweighted processes in V1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".