Optimization and Simplification of PCPA Decoder for Reed-Muller Codes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The collapsed projection-aggregation (CPA) decoder reduces the computational complexity of the recursive projection-aggregation (RPA) decoder by removing the recursive structure. From simulations, the CPA decoder has similar error-correction performance as the RPA decoder, when decoding Reed-Muller (RM) (7, 3) and (8, 2) codes. The computational complexity can be further reduced by only selecting a subset of sub-spaces, which is achieved by pruning CPA decoders. In this work, optimization methods are proposed to find the pruned CPA (PCPA) decoder with small performance loss. Furthermore, the min-sum approximation is used to replace non-linear projection and aggregation functions, and a simplified list decoder based on the syndrome check is proposed. Under the same complexity, the optimized PCPA decoder has less performance loss than randomly constructed PCPA decoders in most case. The min-sum approximation incurs less than 0.15 dB performance loss at a target frame error rate of 10−4, and the simplified list decoder does not have noticeable performance loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".