Auto-Weighted Layer Representation Based View Synthesis Distortion Estimation for 3-D Video Coding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, various view synthesis distortion estimation models have been studied to better serve 3-D video coding. However, they can hardly model the relationship quantitatively among different levels of depth changes, texture degeneration, and view synthesis distortion (VSD), which is crucial for rate-distortion optimization and rate allocation. In this paper, an auto-weighted layer representation based view synthesis distortion estimation model is developed. Firstly, sub-VSD (S-VSD) is defined according to the level of depth changes and their associated texture degeneration. After that, a set of theoretical derivations demonstrate that the VSD can be approximately decomposed into the S-VSDs multiplied by their associated weights. To obtain the S-VSDs efficiently, a layer-based representation method is developed, where all the pixels with the same level of depth changes are represented with a layer. It enables the S-VSD calculation at the layer level. Meanwhile, a nonlinear mapping function is learnt to accurately represent the relationship between the VSD and S-VSDs, automatically providing weights for the S-VSDs during VSD estimation. To learn such a function, a dataset of the VSD and its associated S-VSDs are built, termed as VSDSet. Experimental results show that the VSD can be accurately estimated with the weights learnt by the nonlinear mapping function once its associated S-VSDs are available. The proposed method outperforms the relevant state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and efficiency. The VSDSet and source code of the proposed method will be available athttps://github.com/jianjin008/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".