Bayesian Kernelized Matrix Factorization for Spatiotemporal Traffic Data Imputation and Kriging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Missingness and corruption are common problems for real-world traffic data. How to accurately perform imputation and prediction based on incomplete or even sparse traffic data becomes a critical research question in intelligent transportation systems. Low-rank matrix factorization (MF) is a common solution for the general missing value imputation problem. To better characterize and encode the strong spatial and temporal consistency in traffic data, existing work has introduced flexible spatial/temporal Gaussian process (GP) priors to model the latent factors in MF framework, which also allows us to perform kriging for unseen locations and virtual sensors. However, learning the hyperparameters in GP kernels remains a challenging task. In this paper, we present a Bayesian kernelized matrix factorization (BKMF) model with an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithm for model inference. By learning the kernel hyperparameters from their marginal posteriors through a slice sampling treatment and updating the latent factors alternatively with Gibbs sampling, we achieve a fully Bayesian model for the spatiotemporally kernelized (i.e., GP prior regularized) MF framework. We apply BKMF on both imputation and kriging tasks, and our results demonstrate the superiority of BKMF compared with state-of-the-art spatiotemporal models. In addition, we also explore the effects of different GP kernels in characterizing networked spatiotemporal traffic state data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".