Bayesian Kernelized Matrix Factorization for Spatiotemporal Traffic Data Imputation and Kriging
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Missingness and corruption are common problems for real-world traffic data. How to accurately perform imputation and prediction based on incomplete or even sparse traffic data becomes a critical research question in intelligent transportation systems. Low-rank matrix factorization (MF) is a common solution for the general missing value imputation problem. To better characterize and encode the strong spatial and temporal consistency in traffic data, existing work has introduced flexible spatial/temporal Gaussian process (GP) priors to model the latent factors in MF framework, which also allows us to perform kriging for unseen locations and virtual sensors. However, learning the hyperparameters in GP kernels remains a challenging task. In this paper, we present a Bayesian kernelized matrix factorization (BKMF) model with an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithm for model inference. By learning the kernel hyperparameters from their marginal posteriors through a slice sampling treatment and updating the latent factors alternatively with Gibbs sampling, we achieve a fully Bayesian model for the spatiotemporally kernelized (i.e., GP prior regularized) MF framework. We apply BKMF on both imputation and kriging tasks, and our results demonstrate the superiority of BKMF compared with state-of-the-art spatiotemporal models. In addition, we also explore the effects of different GP kernels in characterizing networked spatiotemporal traffic state data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it