Dynamique des corridors ferroviaires en Asie centrale : autour de la Chine, coopération ou rivalités entre puissances régionales ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lancée en 2013, la Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) est un vaste programme destiné à renforcer la « connectivité » entre la Chine et d’autres régions du monde. Dans ce cadre, plusieurs projets de corridors de transport ont émergé entre la Chine et l’Europe via l’Asie centrale. Ils ont suscité tout à la fois l’intérêt et l’appréhension des États de la région, soucieux de tirer profit des projets chinois tout en préservant leur indépendance. Ainsi, les « nouvelles routes de la soie » sont-elles un facteur de convergence des intérêts des États de la région ou un facteur de rivalités ? Seront ici analysées les relations entre la Chine, la Russie, le Kazakhstan, la Turquie et l’Iran au prisme de leur perception des projets de corridors ferroviaires qui ont émergé ou ont été remis au goût du jour depuis 2013.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".