MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225997914 · doi:10.55784/jupeis.vol1.iss2.42

Validitas Dan Keterbacaan Booklet Capung Untuk Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Zoologi Invertebrata

2022· article· id· W4225997914 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJUPEIS Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capung merupakan salah satu jenis insekta yang merupakan bioindikator dalam lingkungan. Insekta dapat ditemukan di sawah, sehingga sawah merupakan salah satu habitat ditemukannya capung sehingga keberadan capung di sawah dapat meningkatkan sumber belajar yang menarik untuk mahasiswa untuk meningkatkan pemahaman keanekaragaman ordo odonatan pada mata kuliah zoologi invertebrata. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu (1) Menganalisis Keanekaragaman capung jenis ordo odonata yang ditemukan di kawasan persawahan desa Beringin Kencana Kecamatan Tabunganen. (2) Mendeskripsikan validitas booklet yang di susun dari data keanekaragaman capung di kawasan persawahan Beringin Kencana Kecamatan Tabunganen Sebagai bahan ajar mata kuliah zoologi invertebrata. (3) Mendeskripsikan uji keterbacaan booklet yang di susun dari data keanekaragaman capung di kawasan persawahan Beringin Kencana Kecamatan Tabunganen Sebagai pengayaan zoologi invertebrata. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan model R&D yang dikembangkan oleh Borg and Gall dengan tahapan penelitian pengembangan menggunakan langkah-langkah yaitu research and Information collecting, planning, develop preliminary form of product, preliminary field testing, main product revision. Berdasrkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa (1) terdapat 7 spesies capung yaitu Orthetrum sabina, Neurothemis fluctuans, Brachytemis contaminata, Agriocnemis pygmaea, Ceriagrion cerinorubellum, Tholymis tillarga, dan Ischnura senegalensis. (2) Berdasarkan uji validitas Booklet yang dikembangkan dinyatakan sangat valid oleh tiga dosen ahli dengan skornvaliditas pada aspek isi yaitu 88,89%, pada aspek bahasa yaitu 88,89%, dan pada aspek penyajian yaitu 94,44%. (3) Ujinketerbacaann oleh 6 mahasiswa mendapatkan hasil nilai 86,76% sehiingga Booklet mendapatkann kriteriia sangatnbaik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0090.007
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it