Incorporating Gradient Similarity for Robust Time Delay Estimation in Ultrasound Elastography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Energy-based ultrasound elastography techniques minimize a regularized cost function consisting of data and continuity terms to obtain local displacement estimates based on the local time-delay estimation (TDE) between radio frequency (RF) frames. The data term associated with the existing techniques takes only the amplitude similarity into account and hence is not sufficiently robust to the outlier samples present in the RF frames under consideration. This drawback creates noticeable artifacts in the strain image. To resolve this issue, we propose to formulate the data function as a linear combination of the amplitude and gradient similarity constraints. We estimate the adaptive weight concerning each similarity term following an iterative scheme. Finally, we optimize the nonlinear cost function in an efficient manner to convert the problem to a sparse system of linear equations which are solved for millions of variables. We call our technique rGLUE: robust data term in GLobal Ultrasound Elastography. rGLUE has been validated using simulation, phantom, in vivo liver, and breast datasets. In all our experiments, rGLUE substantially outperforms the recent elastography methods both visually and quantitatively. For simulated, phantom, and in vivo datasets, respectively, rGLUE achieves 107%, 18%, and 23% improvements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and 61%, 19%, and 25% improvements of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) over global ultrasound elastography (GLUE), a recently published elastography algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".