Il popolo Indigeno dei Sámi e la Conoscenza Ecologica Tradizionale: difficoltà e lezioni da imparare nel XXI secolo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommario: Questo articolo concerne le culture indigene dell’Artico, ma si focalizza soprattutto sul popolo dei Sámi, l’unico popolo indigeno ufficialmente riconosciuto come tale dall’Unione Europea. L’articolo continua esplorando il territorio Sámi, situato nell’estremo nord europeo e nel nord-ovest della Federazione Russa, e la sua connessione con la cultura Sámi perchè strettamente legato alle loro pratiche di sostentamento tradizionali, quali l’allevamento semi-nomade delle renne e la pesca del salmone. Questo articolo pone inoltre particolare attenzione alla conoscenza ecologica tradizionale Sámi, al rapporto conflittuale di questo corpo di conoscenze con il sapere accademico convenzionale e soprattutto mette in rilevo la critica neocoloniale che evidenzia discriminazioni del sapere non-accademico ufficiale, come la conoscenza ecologica tradizionale Sámi. Abstract: This article concerns the Arctic Indigenous cultures, and it focuses particularly on Sami Indigenous people, which is the only people officially recognized as such in the European Union. It continues presenting the Sami land, located in the extreme European North and in the North-West of the Russian Federation, and its significance for Sami people due to the deep connection with their traditional livelihood practices such as reindeer herding and salmon fishing. This article emphasizes the Sami traditional ecological knowledge, its controversial relation with the academic knowledge and the official science, as well as the neo-colonial critique which highlights the discrimination of non-academic body of knowledge such as the Sami traditional ecological knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".