MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226059119 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n3p25

Integrating Mathematics Education with Technology

2022· article· en· W4226059119 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mridula Purohit, Vipin Kumar, Vipin Solanki, Vinod Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationThe InternetField (mathematics)Computer scienceValue (mathematics)Reform mathematicsConnected MathematicsMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technology, as well as the educational system, has evolved fast in recent decades. Today's demand is for practical as well as modern-oriented mathematics education. In today's world, modern and realistic mathematics education is critical in every country. The value of technology-based mathematics education has increased, signifying a fundamental shift in how mathematics education is seen today. Mathematics education will be simplified if students can access a virtual math classroom over the internet. As a result of the development of computer media, educators, students, and scientists are presented with a challenge: Theoretical frameworks are used in innovation studies in the field of teaching mathematics, but this research focuses on what such theoretical perspectives have to offer. The author's mathematical team's main goal is to create exercises that will enable communication. In addition, they should use technology to improve and broaden their pupils' math skills. This article discusses the approach for generating and employing chemicals for such an objective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207