Agent-Based Model Predictive Controller (AMPC) for Vehicular Stability With Experimental Results
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Model predictive control (MPC) in automotive active safety applications has gained great success in recent years. Detailed vehicle models along with a receding horizon control scheme seek the optimal control distribution among actuators for enhanced performances while satisfying system constraints. To promote the re-usability and scalability of MPC-based vehicular active safety systems, an agent-based MPC (AMPC) is proposed in our previous study for a modularized control architecture. In this paper, implementation of the control scheme is demonstrated on an all-wheel-drive test platform. Both centralized and agent-based MPCs for vehicular stability are compared for their control performances as well as computational costs on embedded hardware. It is shown from experimental results that agent-based MPC is more flexible and computationally efficient in handling vehicle active safety challenges while gives no compromise to control performances compared to their holistically formulated counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it