Orca-RBFNN: A New Machine Learning Method for Control Chart Pattern Recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supervising the production process in different factories and industries is one of the important and basic measures for the production of high quality goods and is of special importance. This is accomplished by monitoring the behavior of a system. Control chart is one of the most widely used and accurate statistical quality control tools that has been used in recent years in various industries to monitor the production process. In this study, a new method for detecting control chart patterns (CCPs) with the aim of online monitoring of the production process is proposed. In the proposed method, the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) is used as a classifier of CCPs and a combination of shape and statistical features is used as input. In the proposed method, unlike the conventional methods in the literature, which use a set of shape or statistical features as input, the features are used intelligently and at different steps. In the RBFNN, center of clusters, number of clusters and their spread has a high impact on the network performance. Therefore, their optimal value must be determined correctly. In the proposed method, Orca optimization algorithm (OOA) is used to determine the value of these parameters. The proposed method was tested on a data set containing 800 samples and the simulation results showed that the proposed method is able to identify eight CCPs with 99.41% accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it