MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226073165 · doi:10.52005/belaindika.v3i3.77

Pengaruh Model Direct Intruction Berbantuan Media Patsang terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika

2021· article· id· W4226073165 on OpenAlexaff
Ika Putri Damayanti

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran dan Inovasi Pendidikan) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model Direct Instruction berbantuan media PATSANG (Papan Tangga Satuan Panjang) terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas III di Desa Growong Kecamatan Tempuran Kabupaten Magelang. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian pre-experimental design dengan model one group pretest posttest design. Subjek penelitian ini menggunakan siswa kelas III di Desa Growong Kecamatan Tempuran Kabupaten Magelang yang berjumlah 10 siswa. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik sampling jenuh. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa tes dalam bentuk pilihan ganda. Uji validitas instrumen tes menggunakan teknik korelasi product moment sedangkan uji reliabilitas menggunakan rumus cronbach alpha dengan bantuan program IMBSPSS versi 24.00 for windows. Uji prasyarat analisis data menggunakan uji normalitas shapiro-wilk dan analisis data yang digunakan yaitu uji paired sample T-test dengan bantuan IMBSPSS versi 24.00 for windows. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model Direct Instruction berbantuan media PATSANG (Papan Tangga Satuan Panjang) berpengaruh terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Hal ini dibuktikan dari hasil analisis uji paired sample T-test yaitu nilai sig (2-tailed) 0,000<0,05. Berdasarkan analisis dan pembahasan, terdapat perbedaan nilai rata-rata yaitu 56 sebelum diberikan perlakuan dan 73 setelah diberikan perlakuan. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa model Direct Instruction berbantuan media PATSANG membuat siswa lebih mudah dalam memahami sehingga hasil belajar lebih meningkat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran dan Inovasi Pendidikan)Same topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207