MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226074824 · doi:10.23977/jemm.2022.070104

The Structure Design of a New Kind Powder Dispenser

2022· article· en· W4226074824 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guanghui Bao, Wen-Cheng Wang, Zhao Zijian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and Machinery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHebei University
KeywordsALARMEveningMistakeMorningComputer scienceMedical emergencyMedicineEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at the problems of older people often forget to take medicine or take the mistake dose, The structure of an powder dispenser was designed, which was composed of a powder storage device, a powder delivery device, a powder collection device, a powder weighing device, a water heating device, a powder preparation device and a drug delivery device. The medicine dispenser is equipped with three reminding alarm clocks to meet the user's medication needs in three different time periods: morning, noon and evening. the alarm sounds, and the user only needs to press the corresponding powder button to realize the medicine out. The device can help the elderly and children simplify the steps of taking powdered medicines, prevent safety accidents such as burns when taking the powdered medicines, and enable the elderly and children to obtain the prepared medicines with one button and drink them directly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and MachinerySame topicIntravenous Infusion Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207