MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226074932 · doi:10.5267/j.msl.2022.2.002

The impact of spiritual leadership on the decision-making process in the Kuwaiti ministries

2022· article· en· W4226074932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mubarak Motlaq Qtaim Almutairi, Aysar Mohammad Khashman

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement Science Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)PsychologyPopulationSurvey researchSociologyApplied psychologyComputer scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the impact of spiritual leadership on the decision-making process in Kuwaiti ministries. Also, this study adopted a quantitative analytical, and descriptive approach. The study relies on the strategy of a comprehensive survey of the study population, and it depends on the questionnaire as a main tool in collecting primary data. The survey is conducted on 322 employees in the Kuwaiti ministries. The data analysis uses the SPSS version 26. The results show that spiritual leadership dimensions, vision, altruistic love, calling, hope, and membership, have a significant impact on the decision-making process in the Kuwaiti ministries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement Science LettersSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207