Distribution of Algae of the Genus Savoiea M.J.Wynne (Ceramilaes, Rhodophyta) in the Northern Pacific
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Having assessed the diversity and biogeography of a number of marine algae of the order Ceramiales, in collaboration with Canadian phycologists, it was thought that the species, which was considered to be widespread throughout the North Pacific, actually had a more limited geographical distribution. However, further molecular studies revealed genetic similarity between some algae from Russian waters and the Pacific coast of North America. The members of the family Rhodomelaceae (Ceramiales), formerly belonging to the genus Pterosiphonia, and now representing the genus Savoiea, are among them. As a result of our study, we have clarified the taxonomic status of the Savoiea species, and their range in the Russian area of the Pacific Ocean. Wide distribution of S. bipinnata (Postels & Ruprecht) M.J.Wynne and S. hamata (Sinova) Wynne in the northwestern Pacific was confirmed, but it was noted that S. arctica (J.Agardh) M.J.Wynne is reliably found only in the northern seas of Russia, and indication of this species in the Pacific Russian area is likely erroneous. On the contrary, the growth of S. robusta (N.L.Gardner) Wynne in the northwestern Pacific, first discovered in Kamchatka, is validated by distinct morphological and anatomical features of the studied samples, as well as our genetic studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".