Isometric Hamming embeddings of weighted graphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mapping α:V(G)→V(H) from the vertex set of one graph G to another graph H is an isometric embedding if the shortest path distance between any two vertices in G equals the distance between their images in H. Here, we consider isometric embeddings of a weighted graph G into unweighted Hamming graphs, called Hamming embeddings, when G satisfies the property that every edge is a shortest path between its endpoints. Using a Cartesian product decomposition of G called its canonical isometric representation, we show that every Hamming embedding of G may be partitioned into a canonical partition, whose parts provide Hamming embeddings for each factor of the canonical isometric representation of G. This implies that G permits a Hamming embedding if and only if each factor of its canonical isometric representation is Hamming embeddable. This result extends prior work on unweighted graphs that showed that an unweighted graph permits a Hamming embedding if and only if each factor is a complete graph. When a graph G has nontrivial isometric representation, determining whether G has a Hamming embedding can be simplified to checking embeddability of two or more smaller graphs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".