MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226093117 · doi:10.1002/ange.202203669

LiNbO<sub>3</sub>‐Type Polar Antiferromagnet InVO<sub>3</sub> Synthesized under High‐Pressure Conditions

2022· article· en· W4226093117 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhenhong Tan, Joey A. Lussier, Takumi Yamada, Yuanhui Xu, Takashi Saito, Masato Goto, Yoshihisa Kosugi, Dmitry Vrublevskiy, Yoshihiko Kanemitsu, Mario Bieringer, Yuichi Shimakawa

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsPolarGround stateAntiferromagnetismChemistryPolarization (electrochemistry)Condensed matter physicsPerovskite (structure)High pressureCrystallographyChemical physicsAtomic physicsPhysical chemistryPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ambient pressure cation disordered InVO3 bixbyite has been predicted to form a GdFeO3‐type perovskite phase under high pressure and high temperature. Contrary to the expectation, InVO3 was found to crystallize in the polar LiNbO3‐type structure with a calculated spontaneous polarization as large as 74 μC cm−2. Antiferromagnetic coupling of V3+ magnetic moments and a cooperative magnetic ground state below about 10 K coupled with a polar structure suggest an intriguing ground state of the novel LiNbO3‐type high‐pressure InVO3 structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte ChemieSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207