Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nearly 23 percent of the US adult population suffers from arthritis and patients of knee arthritis find it extremely painful to sit down or stand from a sitting position. In this research paper I have endeavoured to design a total knee support exoskeleton to assist people suffering from knee arthritis. High torque DC and servo motors were used in the model which can be controlled using a Bluetooth remote control or app. The choice of motors was based on the torque that is borne by the knee when the leg or thigh move. The model lends support to both the thigh and the lower leg and helps in motion of sitting, standing and lying down. The present model has been developed keeping in mind considerations of portability, affordability and commercial viability. The model has been conceptualized after making calculations on torque about the knee, and successfully reduces the metabolic cost of moving the leg or thigh. This exoskeleton will assist a wide population being lightweight, portable, and affordable and uses electrical parts to maximize the reduction in torque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it