MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In-utero exposure to indoor air pollution or tobacco smoke and cognitive development in a South African birth cohort study

2022· article· en· W4226100316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaPacific Centre for Reproductive MedicineUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of HealthMedical Research CouncilSouth African Medical Research CouncilNational Research FoundationWellcome TrustBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental healthTobacco smokeIn uteroAir pollutionPregnancyIndoor air qualityParticulatesSmokePollutionPrenatal exposureMedicineEnvironmental scienceFetusGeographyGestationEnvironmental engineeringMeteorologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is increasing evidence indicating that air pollution exposure is associated with neuronal damage. Since pregnancy is a critical window of vulnerability, air pollution exposure during this period could have adverse effects on neurodevelopment. This study aims 1) to analyze associations of prenatal exposure to indoor air pollution (particulate matter with diameters ≤10 μm, PM10) and tobacco smoke with neurodevelopment and 2) to determine whether these associations are mediated by deviations of epigenetic gestational age from chronological gestational age (ΔGA). Data of 734 children from the South African Drakenstein Child Health Study were analyzed. Prenatal PM10 exposure was measured using devices placed in the families' homes. Maternal smoking during pregnancy was determined by maternal urine cotinine measures. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III (BSID-III) was used to measure cognition, language and motor development and adaptive behavior at two years of age. Linear regression models adjusted for maternal age, gestational age, sex of child, ancestry, birth weight/length, and socioeconomic status were used to explore associations between air pollutants and BSID-III scores. A mediation analysis was conducted to analyze if these associations were mediated by ΔGA using DNA methylation measurements from cord blood. An increase of one interquartile range in natural-log transformed PM10 (lnPM10; 1.58 μg/m3) was significantly associated with lower composite scores in cognition, language, and adaptive behavior sub-scores (composite score β-estimate [95%-confidence interval]: −0.950 [−1.821, −0.120]). Maternal smoking was significantly associated with lower adaptive behavior scores (−3.386 [−5.632, −1.139]). Associations were not significantly mediated by ΔGA (e.g., for PM10 and cognition, proportion mediated [p-value]: 4% [0.52]). We found an association of prenatal exposure to indoor air pollution (PM10) and tobacco smoke on neurodevelopment at two years of age, particularly cognition, language, and adaptive behavior. Further research is needed to understand underlying biological mediators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it