The Cocreation of Place Meaning at Small-Scale Elite Youth-Based Sport Event
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study uses Morgan's model of experience space as a framework for understanding the cocreation of place meaning at the 2017 Canadian Championships in Rhythmic Gymnastics (2017 CCRG). The efforts of event organizers (experience managers and marketers) to shape place experiences at the event was considered in conjunction with the visitors' motivations and their interpretation of meanings inclusive of the social and cultural interactions at the event. Research methods included semistructured interviews and e-mail questionnaires. Five place-based themes emerged through categorical aggregation analysis: function, tourist activities, community, performance, and emotion. These findings demonstrated the relevance of the Morgan's model of experience space. However, modifications to the model were recommended. These include the combination of the achievement, hedonic pleasure and personal meanings components under the label of emotion, and the introduction of a new "performance" component. The 2017CCRG shaped place meaning for athletes, parents, and organizers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it