MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4226112864 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-14949

Optimizing and Validating a Caenorhabditis Elegans Model as a Tool for Assessing Contaminant-Induced Oxidative Stress and Oxylipin Signalling

2022· dissertation· en· W4226112864 on OpenAlexaff
Colleen Clarke

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxylipinOxidative stressCaenorhabditis elegansReactive oxygen speciesParaquatEndoplasmic reticulumCYP2E1Oxidative phosphorylationCytochrome P450AntioxidantBiochemistryCell biologyMitochondrionXenobioticBiologyEnzymeChemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxidative stress (OS) is a physiological mechanism that is induced by pollutants and can lead to pathophysiological conditions.Pollutants may be activated by phase I metabolism enzymes, becoming more reactive, inducing additional OS.Paraquatinduced OS was measured in Caenorhabditis elegans that were modified to express CYP2E1-a human cytochrome P450 enzyme that bioactivates xenobiotics-in either their endoplasmic reticulum (erCYP2E1) or mitochondria (mtCYP2E1).Paraquat induced worm death, but deaths were reduced when worms were incubated in antioxidants.Reactive oxygen species significantly increased in mtCYP2E1 and wild-type worms, and significantly decreased in erCYP2E1 worms.These assays will validate a final OS testing method: monitoring global oxylipin production by tandem mass spectrometry.Oxylipins are potent signalling molecules in stress responses, and optimization efforts increased their detection by 66%.Further oxylipin testing will provide a mechanistic overview of the OS response which could explain differences in CYP2E1 isozyme activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism→French-language works237,207→