Extending AV1 Codec to Enhance Quality in Phase Compression of Digital Holograms in Object and Hologram Planes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Holography is a 3D capturing and displaying system. Many formats have been suggested to store holographic images with the highest quality and minimum file size. Here, we suggest combining two AV1 codecs to make a secondary error image and use it in a linear regression block to compensate for the main AV1 compression error. Since the phase part is the most challenging part of holograms, the proposed method addresses the compression problem in phase. The obtained results reveal that the proposed method can outperform the state-of-the-art codecs in terms of PSNR and SSIM criteria. Besides, comparing BD-PSNR and BD-Rate results with usual AV1, confirms the proposed method has an average about 5.04dB, which is −22.1% better Object plane performance, and 4.57 dB, which is −20.66% better in Holo plane performance, in terms of BDPSNR and BD-Rate, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it